<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Konstpeppens politik</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copyriot.se/2009/05/24/konstpeppens-politik/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copyriot.se/2009/05/24/konstpeppens-politik/</link>
	<description>Multiplication can produce powerful numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:39:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gunnar</title>
		<link>http://copyriot.se/2009/05/24/konstpeppens-politik/comment-page-1/#comment-30576</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyriot.se/?p=1691#comment-30576</guid>
		<description>Allt som är skarpt, kritisk och modigt är emellertid inte konst, kanske man också ska bära i minnet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allt som är skarpt, kritisk och modigt är emellertid inte konst, kanske man också ska bära i minnet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalle P</title>
		<link>http://copyriot.se/2009/05/24/konstpeppens-politik/comment-page-1/#comment-30575</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalle P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyriot.se/?p=1691#comment-30575</guid>
		<description>Shit, trodde for a minute att Nigel Thrift hade en Wordpress-blogg! 

Hur som helst - som icke-frankofon sörjer jag att jag inte kan läsa Lazzaratos bok om Tarde vs. Traditionell Politisk Ekonomi. Känns som att den borde vara en intressant diskussion om relationen mellan samtida italienare och den dåtide frassen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shit, trodde for a minute att Nigel Thrift hade en WordPress-blogg! </p>
<p>Hur som helst &#8211; som icke-frankofon sörjer jag att jag inte kan läsa Lazzaratos bok om Tarde vs. Traditionell Politisk Ekonomi. Känns som att den borde vara en intressant diskussion om relationen mellan samtida italienare och den dåtide frassen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comments on Copyriot&#8217;s post &#171; immaterial blog</title>
		<link>http://copyriot.se/2009/05/24/konstpeppens-politik/comment-page-1/#comment-30574</link>
		<dc:creator>Comments on Copyriot&#8217;s post &#171; immaterial blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyriot.se/?p=1691#comment-30574</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments on Copyriot&#8217;s&#160;post  Posted in Uncategorized by merrok on May 26, 2009   Reply to the very interesting post about the pepp-march and the immaterial project on the Copyriot blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments on Copyriot&#8217;s&nbsp;post  Posted in Uncategorized by merrok on May 26, 2009   Reply to the very interesting post about the pepp-march and the immaterial project on the Copyriot blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merrok</title>
		<link>http://copyriot.se/2009/05/24/konstpeppens-politik/comment-page-1/#comment-30573</link>
		<dc:creator>Merrok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 10:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyriot.se/?p=1691#comment-30573</guid>
		<description>Where biopolitics, according to the distinction made by Agamben, concerns the naked life (what the Greeks called zoe), immaterial labour puts into profit the bios as a whole, the particular
forms of life, including that of &quot;being speaker&quot; - the very nature of the speaker, through immaterial labour, is separated by force from his nature as a living being (which in turn produces a series of problems of great importance and is possibly the main cause of
existential discomfort). As it is impossible to cease either speaking
or engaging in processes of socialization, we continue to produce
value even through small daily gestures, as we try to emphasize through our questionnaire online. It is difficult to employ the methods of a classical strike (an interruption of work in the factories), and it is up to the coming politics to discern the new
forms of negotiation and how to change the conditions of this process.
In this sense, the comment of the value produced by this kind of march
is completely appropriate. Indeed, the march has also animated the
city for the benefit of citizens and tourists (present in the areas
around Centralstation, a location possibly unsuitable for the march).
It might, in fact, be justifiable to demand compensation from the
tourism industry or local municipality for these actions. This was
precisely the meaning of the flyer: &quot;Art is working, and so are you.&quot;

Therefore, it&#039;s unlikely that speaking of immaterial labor results
in talking about a virtual world. The wedding of art to life, as
realized by performance before the march, was intended also to imply
that art should not be perceived as ideology, a world distant from
life and its materiality. Here, the contradiction is only apparent.
On the other hand, the march through the streets of the city is a very
&quot;material&quot; activity which potentially annoys some who see art as a
privileged sphere, separate from politics and economy. We supported from the start the process of the march, the clear absence of controversial
content could be criticized, but it must also be read in terms of its
positive value: the thrilling physical affirmation of sociability -- a
way of affirming the artist as a subjectivity in a highly visible
manner. The spirit of the march was not a provocative one, seeking the
effect of being involved in a debate, of which the terms were already
established by judges and media.

It is true that artists are an emblematic category in the discourse of
immaterial labor. This discourse, however, is not only about them, but
about all social and creative production elicited by all members of society. Goethe and Strindberg admitted that the
task of the writer is a constant borrowing of ideas from the social
environment around him. From them to the cool hunters of the marketing agencys the tune didn&#039;t change.
The issue of physical spaces therefore
deserves increased attention. Surely, the joyous appropriation late
into the night, and early into the morning, of Konstfack was a good exemple that should be extended (finally, a
DJ who has captured the feeling of a dance floor and engaged this
spirit by playing good music -- a rare thing in Stockholm). Indeed, we
are probably talking about a gray zone: immaterial lobour is most likely the point at which life and politics converge.
F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where biopolitics, according to the distinction made by Agamben, concerns the naked life (what the Greeks called zoe), immaterial labour puts into profit the bios as a whole, the particular<br />
forms of life, including that of &#8220;being speaker&#8221; &#8211; the very nature of the speaker, through immaterial labour, is separated by force from his nature as a living being (which in turn produces a series of problems of great importance and is possibly the main cause of<br />
existential discomfort). As it is impossible to cease either speaking<br />
or engaging in processes of socialization, we continue to produce<br />
value even through small daily gestures, as we try to emphasize through our questionnaire online. It is difficult to employ the methods of a classical strike (an interruption of work in the factories), and it is up to the coming politics to discern the new<br />
forms of negotiation and how to change the conditions of this process.<br />
In this sense, the comment of the value produced by this kind of march<br />
is completely appropriate. Indeed, the march has also animated the<br />
city for the benefit of citizens and tourists (present in the areas<br />
around Centralstation, a location possibly unsuitable for the march).<br />
It might, in fact, be justifiable to demand compensation from the<br />
tourism industry or local municipality for these actions. This was<br />
precisely the meaning of the flyer: &#8220;Art is working, and so are you.&#8221;</p>
<p>Therefore, it&#8217;s unlikely that speaking of immaterial labor results<br />
in talking about a virtual world. The wedding of art to life, as<br />
realized by performance before the march, was intended also to imply<br />
that art should not be perceived as ideology, a world distant from<br />
life and its materiality. Here, the contradiction is only apparent.<br />
On the other hand, the march through the streets of the city is a very<br />
&#8220;material&#8221; activity which potentially annoys some who see art as a<br />
privileged sphere, separate from politics and economy. We supported from the start the process of the march, the clear absence of controversial<br />
content could be criticized, but it must also be read in terms of its<br />
positive value: the thrilling physical affirmation of sociability &#8212; a<br />
way of affirming the artist as a subjectivity in a highly visible<br />
manner. The spirit of the march was not a provocative one, seeking the<br />
effect of being involved in a debate, of which the terms were already<br />
established by judges and media.</p>
<p>It is true that artists are an emblematic category in the discourse of<br />
immaterial labor. This discourse, however, is not only about them, but<br />
about all social and creative production elicited by all members of society. Goethe and Strindberg admitted that the<br />
task of the writer is a constant borrowing of ideas from the social<br />
environment around him. From them to the cool hunters of the marketing agencys the tune didn&#8217;t change.<br />
The issue of physical spaces therefore<br />
deserves increased attention. Surely, the joyous appropriation late<br />
into the night, and early into the morning, of Konstfack was a good exemple that should be extended (finally, a<br />
DJ who has captured the feeling of a dance floor and engaged this<br />
spirit by playing good music &#8212; a rare thing in Stockholm). Indeed, we<br />
are probably talking about a gray zone: immaterial lobour is most likely the point at which life and politics converge.<br />
F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Report: Pepp-March for Art &#171; immaterial blog</title>
		<link>http://copyriot.se/2009/05/24/konstpeppens-politik/comment-page-1/#comment-30569</link>
		<dc:creator>Report: Pepp-March for Art &#171; immaterial blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 11:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyriot.se/?p=1691#comment-30569</guid>
		<description>[...] skriver om Pepp March och Immaterial: http://copyriot.se/2009/05/24/konstpeppens-politik/  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] skriver om Pepp March och Immaterial: <a href="http://copyriot.se/2009/05/24/konstpeppens-politik/" rel="nofollow">http://copyriot.se/2009/05/24/konstpeppens-politik/</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

